"Whether we and our politicians know it or not, Nature is party to all our deals and decisions, and she has more votes, a longer memory, and a sterner sense of justice than we do." — Wendell Berry
See https://667-per-cm.net/about. Retired data scientist and statistician. Now working projects in quantitative ecology and, specifically, phenology of Bryophyta and technical methods for their study.
Most investors are not rational, at least they don’t behave as if they are. This is the result of behavioral economics. While efficient market theory is based upon arbitrage to equilibrate prices incorporating all known possible information, in fact, success in the marketplace depends upon understanding the irrationality of investors as well as fundamentals.
The argument that research or, by extension, the recommendations of securities analysts are a gateway to successful assessment of a stock suggests the required and typical publications of the company itself convey no useful information. While they may withhold or be biased, they contribute some useful information, and a smart investor with sufficient time and resources could make assessments of the company and its competitors with some fidelity. If that is true, then research is a convenience or an adjunct, but it is not essential.
Irrespective of whether or not there are stock indexes or mutual funds, most holdings are by large funds, such as pension funds. Such funds tend to use a sector-weighted approach to investing. There is little difference between investing in sectors with a portfolio of representative stocks and investing in an index for the sector. This is why, for instance, energy stocks tend to move up and down inversely with the price of oil, even if they are zero Carbon energy stocks.
As Levine discusses from both sides of the question, the fact of life in the markets is that, increasingly, capital is being provided from private markets, not the publicly traded ones. Indeed, from an empirical perspective, it is difficult to separate out trends which might occur in the public markets solely based upon factors represented in those markets without considering the effects of large private investment. Such investment, almost by definition, is more difficult to characterize.
I would add that not only are investors not rational, even if they are they are severely limited in assessing lag structure between economic forcings and their manifestations in markets. That is, even if they are good at (read “have predictive skill in”) determining there are forcings and pricing them, timing lags for manifestation are not well done.
Finally, I’d argue that the point that “Indexes are bad because they destroy research, and that this is a unacceptable therefore should not be done” is a fallacious argument, namely, Camel’s Nose.
The interesting thing is that security prices would be wrong, meaningless, or undefined if everyone were a passive investor.
That’s clearly true, because the advantage of the passive investor is that they don’t pay for research; if no one paid for research, there would be no connection between a stock’s performance and it’s price.
So, the conclusion is that active investors perform a critical function, but it doesn’t benefit them, so they need to lie to collect the money that the market needs to conduct research.
I.e. the stock market wouldn’t function if everyone were a rational, well-informed investor.
Higgs from AIR describing NAO and EA
Stephanie Higgs from AIR Worldwide gives a nice description of NAO and EA in the context of discussing “The Geographic Impact of Climate Signals on European Winter Storms”
Prediction vs Forecasting: Knaub
“Unfortunately, ‘prediction,’ such as used in model-based survey estimation, is a term that is often subsumed under the term ‘forecasting,’ but here we show why it is important not to confuse these two terms.”
Pat's blog
While it is described as “The mathematical (and other) thoughts of a (now retired) math teacher”, this is false humility, as it chronicles the present and past life and times of mathematicians in their context. Recommended.
GeoEnergy Math
Prof Paul Pukite’s Web site devoted to energy derived from geological and geophysical processes and categorized according to its originating source.
Why "naive Bayes" is not Bayesian
Explains why the so-called “naive Bayes” classifier is not Bayesian. The setup is okay, but estimating probabilities by doing relative frequencies instead of using Dirichlet conjugate priors or integration strays from The Path.
BioPython
A collection of Python tools for quantitative Biology
Darren Wilkinson's introduction to ABC
Darren Wilkinson’s introduction to approximate Bayesian computation (“ABC”). See also his post about summary statistics for ABC https://darrenjw.wordpress.com/2013/09/01/summary-stats-for-abc/
Quotes by Nikola Tesla
Quotes by Nikola Tesla, including some of others he greatly liked.
Hermann Scheer
Hermann Scheer was a visionary, a major guy, who thought deep thoughts about energy, and its implications for humanity’s relationship with physical reality
Mathematics and Climate Research Network
The Mathematics and Climate Research Network (MCRN) engages mathematicians to collaborating on the cryosphere, conceptual model validation, data assimilation, the electric grid, food systems, nonsmooth systems, paleoclimate, resilience, tipping points.
Climate change: Evidence and causes
A project of the UK Royal Society: (1) Answers to key questions, (2) evidence and causes, and (3) a short guide to climate science
`The unchained goddess'
1958 Bell Telephone Science Hour broadcast regarding, among other things, climate change.
HotWhopper: It's excellent.
Global warming and climate change. Eavesdropping on the deniosphere, its weird pseudo-science and crazy conspiracy whoppers.
"Warming Slowdown?" (part 2 of 2)
The idea of a global warming slowdown or hiatus is critically examined, emphasizing the literature, the datasets, and means and methods for telling such. The second part.
Anti—Anti-#ClimateEmergency
Whether to declare a climate emergency is debatable. But some critics have gone way overboard.
Équiterre
Equiterre helps build a social movement by encouraging individuals, organizations and governments to make ecological and equitable choices, in a spirit of solidarity.
The beach boondoggle
Prof Rob Young on how owners of beach property are socializing their risks at costs to all of us, not the least being it seems coastal damage is less than it actually is
Sir David King
David King’s perspective on climate, and the next thousands of years for humanity
The pros and cons of index investing have been chronicled by Matt Levine at Bloomberg. That said, a couple of points:
Some pertinent Levine articles on the subject:
Whistleblowers and indexing
Snapchat, indexes, and free research
Wall Street analysts give investors what they want
Market milking and research troubles
Expensive research and cheap hedge funds
The interesting thing is that security prices would be wrong, meaningless, or undefined if everyone were a passive investor.
That’s clearly true, because the advantage of the passive investor is that they don’t pay for research; if no one paid for research, there would be no connection between a stock’s performance and it’s price.
So, the conclusion is that active investors perform a critical function, but it doesn’t benefit them, so they need to lie to collect the money that the market needs to conduct research.
I.e. the stock market wouldn’t function if everyone were a rational, well-informed investor.