Radiative Forcing: Where We Stand | 667 per cm

667 per cm

Skip to content

Home
About

← “The universe doesn’t care what you believe”

“Nested Sampling of Radial Velocity Curve” →

Radiative Forcing: Where We Stand

Posted on 7 October 2013 by ecoquant

The RealClimate blog has a very nice history of how these have developed today.

Share this:

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

About ecoquant

See https://667-per-cm.net/about

View all posts by ecoquant →

This entry was posted in chemistry, climate, climate education, environment, geophysics, meteorology, science and tagged atmospheric radiation, climate, geophysics, science. Bookmark the permalink.

← “The universe doesn’t care what you believe”

“Nested Sampling of Radial Velocity Curve” →

Leave a reply. Commenting standards are described in the About section linked from banner. Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Notify me of new comments via email.

Notify me of new posts via email.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for:
Distributed Solar: The Democratizaton of Energy
Blogroll
climate change
Archives
Archives

Blog Stats
- 79,614 hits
Recent Posts
- Field survey update for 2021-01-20: Bryophytes, lichens, and Lycopodia in winter 21 January 2021
- “Environmentalists’climate change myths” 20 January 2021
- “The U.S. should lead the world on climate change” 19 January 2021
- Consumer, Employment, and Environmental Benefits of Electricity Transmission Expansion in the Eastern United States 18 January 2021
- banks aren’t interested … 7 January 2021
- “What comes next?” 6 January 2021
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 2020: Looking forward to 2021 and well beyond 4 January 2021
- Introducing a long term longitudinal survey of some bryophytes, lichens, and Lycopodium individuals 29 December 2020
- A harmful visitor who thrives because of climate change: Adelges tsugae 28 December 2020
- Hints on a second edition of Principles of Planetary Climate 27 December 2020
- Wind turbines don’t kill (many) birds, but people do 26 December 2020
- Physicists Doing Blues 26 December 2020
- The engagement with SARS-CoV-2: Where we stand in the United States, in curated numbers 26 December 2020
- Happy Newtonmas, 2020 25 December 2020
- Fossil fuels have no future 19 December 2020
- Much ado about explosive methane 14 December 2020
- a song in praise of data scientist Rebekah Jones 12 December 2020
- … [T]oo detached from my natural origins to see the problem … 11 December 2020
- From False Progress 9 December 2020
- On living with wind turbines 9 December 2020
- What’s wrong with Massachusetts? Land wind turbines! 7 December 2020
- Congratulations China! 3 December 2020
- Net Zero Emissions 2 December 2020
- On the Nuclear option 1 December 2020
- “If I were Secretary of Energy” 30 November 2020
- Book: 100% Clean, Renewable Energy and Storage for Everything 27 November 2020
- “Rollin’ and Tumblin'” New York State Blues Fest 27 November 2020
- The U.S. Constitution is a remarkable construct … 26 November 2020
- Codium fragile for Saturday, 21st November 2020 21 November 2020
- Dr Emily Shuckburgh, OBE : Where we are 20 November 2020
- How Norfolk County Massachusetts preserves forest 19 November 2020
- “Climate Hope” from Climate Adam 17 November 2020
- Selfish Routing is Why, in the Long Term, CDNs are not in everyone’s best interest 16 November 2020
- Wake Up 15 November 2020
- (We are) So Far From Home 15 November 2020
- Choices. 12 November 2020
- ‘Biden voting counties equal 70% of America’s economy’ 12 November 2020
- Complexity vs Simplicity in Geophysics 10 November 2020
- Six Principle Plays in Denialist Playbook 9 November 2020
- Rethinking Environmentalism 5 November 2020
- “The bamboozle has captured us.” 1 November 2020
- It’s time. 1 November 2020
- Phase Plane plots of COVID-19 deaths with uncertainties 30 October 2020
- Muehlenberg County 25 October 2020
- RethinkX update on Wind, Solar, and Storage 24 October 2020
- (no title) 24 October 2020
- “We will love science and its controversies.” 23 October 2020
- “No, COVID-19 Is not the Flu” 23 October 2020
- dead bodies vs economic integrity 19 October 2020
- “A Matter of Degrees” 17 October 2020
Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 109 other followers

Email Address:
Goodreads

Kalman filtering and smoothing; dynamic linear models

Also, see datasets and R examples to accompany this excellent text.

I have used dlm almost exclusively, except when extreme efficiency was required. Since Jouni Helske's KFAS was rewritten, though, I'm increasingly drawn to it, because the noise sources it supports are more diverse than dlm's. KFAS uses the notation and approaches of Durbin, Koopman, and Harvey.

``The real problem is that programmers have spent far too much time worrying about efficiency in the wrong places and at the wrong times; premature optimization is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming.''
Professor Donald Knuth, 1974
author

Add your thoughts here... (optional) Post to

Cancel

Send to Email Address Your Name Your Email Address

Cancel

Post was not sent - check your email addresses!

Email check failed, please try again

Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.

%d bloggers like this: