Now, if we could only say the same thing about Massachusetts …

Massachusetts is supposed to be a Blue State.

Massachusetts is supposed to be concerned about the environment, full of tree-hugging eco-weenies (like myself!), and sprouting solar panels from every other rooftop.

Massachusetts is supposed to have aggressive support for zero Carbon energy, including incentives, SRECs, and so on.

But facts are different.

59% of Massachusetts electricity comes from explosive methane (“natural gas” to those of you who prefer industry adverts). This is a potent greenhouse gas which, in 20 year timeframes, is 90x worse than CO2 for climate disrupting radiative forcing. (See if you have doubts.) Natural gas ain’t granola. And the calculations which suggest it is better for the environment are, in my opinion, whacked and bupkis. Set aside upstream impacts from fracking. Not all methane is burnt when it goes up your chimney for heating, nor in generating plants. There are big leaks throughout the Boston metropolitan area which the utilities will fix “if they are dangerous”, but they don’t consider greenhouse gas emissions dangerous. And we all known we have to transition off of fossil fuels, for the good of ourselves, a coastal state as we are, and the moral good of the planet and people on it, not to mention the recently affirmed requirements of the Global Warming Solutions Act (“GWSA”). The Union of Concerned Scientists says we are getting overdependent upon natural gas. And the comparison with coal as a benefit is a logical fallacy of “the worst negates the bad”.

That’s quite different than Texas. Yes, Texas. Home of cowboy boots, and guns, and Spectra Energy.


  1. Texas holds the record for all-time wind energy production.
  2. The benefits of wind are estimated at $3.3 billion annually.
  3. Texas was the first US state to reach 10,000 megawatts of wind power generating capacity.
  4. Texas was One of the First U.S. States to Require a Certain Amount of Electricity Come from Renewable Energy Sources. (As was Massachusetts, to its credit.)
  5. Texas wind power is cheaper than fossil fuels.
  6. The Texas wind industry employs more than 24,000 workers.

Without going really big on offshore wind and solar, Massachusetts could be being just being a bunch of chumps. And I often wonder if Spectra Energy isn’t trying to dump their explosive methane here, because people at home know better. Or it could be Massachusetts citizens are hypocrites, claiming to be for something, until it affects their own back yards. Or it could be, Massachusetts leadership is having $100,000 spent on them, just in 2016.





About ecoquant

See Retired data scientist and statistician. Now working projects in quantitative ecology and, specifically, phenology of Bryophyta and technical methods for their study.
This entry was posted in Anthropocene, Bloomberg New Energy Finance, bridge to nowhere, bridge to somewhere, Buckminster Fuller, Cape Wind, Carbon Worshipers, citizenship, clean disruption, climate business, corruption, decentralized electric power generation, decentralized energy, demand-side solutions, destructive economic development, distributed generation, economics, electricity, electricity markets, energy, energy utilities, explosive methane, fossil fuel divestment, fossil fuels, gas pipeline leaks, Green Tea Coalition, greenhouse gases, Hyper Anthropocene, investment in wind and solar energy, ISO-NE, Joseph Schumpeter, leaving fossil fuels in the ground, local generation, MA, Mark Jacobson, Massachusetts, Massachusetts Clean Energy Center, Massachusetts Interfaith Coalition for Climate Action, Michael Osborne, natural gas, New England, Nikola Tesla, pipelines, politics, public utility commissions, PUCs, rate of return regulation, rationality, reason, reasonableness, regulatory capture, risk, Sankey diagram, solar energy, solar power, Spaceship Earth, supply chains, Texas, the energy of the people, the green century, the tragedy of our present civilization, the value of financial assets, Tony Seba, wind energy, wind power, zero carbon. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Now, if we could only say the same thing about Massachusetts …

  1. Gingerbaker says:

    “explosive methane” – like it!

    good post 🙂

Leave a reply. Commenting standards are described in the About section linked from banner.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.