Guy Ottewell's website and weblog
Updates on my research and expository papers, discussion of open problems, and other maths-related topics. By Terence Tao
Pop Culture with a Different Perspective
The Dr. is in...
The unofficial guide to your Synology
Academic comment and analysis on Brexit, run from the UCL European Institute
Visualizing Complex Data
Organic Gardening tips
Serving Needham, Dover, and Precincts 1 and 2 of Medfield
Boston News, Sports, Weather, Traffic and Boston's Best
citizen botany for the phytocurious
Stories about protecting, restoring, and enjoying your Buzzards Bay
quick easy access high quality links and comment re climate change, encroaching fascism, pricking pretension and the obsession of thinking 'we are so modern' ...
Risk and Well-Being in a World of Changing Climate, Resources, Technology and Growth
"There Are No Solutions, Only Trade-Offs."
Environmental science of climate, carbon, and energy
Daily News about Energy and Climate Change
Lover of math. Bad at drawing.
A quarterly series dedicated to thought leadership on adaptation to climate change.
Lecture notes for CPSC 536N "Randomized Algorithms"
Research that Informs Business and Public Policy
Energy, Environment and Policy
likhipa inhlanzi emanzini
... for when you can't solve life's problems with statistics alone.
Exploring and venting about quantitative issues
Newscasts on Global Warming, Its Consequences & Solutions
A Welcoming Congregation & A Green Sanctuary
analytics and data science
Boston Area Sustainability Group
with Peter Sinclair
Engineering, Oceanography, and Innovation in Environmental Science
notes on data science, mathematical finance, algo trading and derivatives
Tips and tricks on programming, evolutionary algorithms, and doing research
Experiments & Experiences in R
Critical perspectives on technology, sustainability, and the future
Astronomy, space and space travel for the non scientist
Noah Deich's blog on all things Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR)
I wonder how much articles like this, and the current “Losing Earth”, will affect the further evisceration of whatever might be possible relative to a political coalition to address the “fine mess YOU’VE(!) gotten us into”? Systemically the mess is a matter of motivated reasoning regarding a trusted irrational economic paradigm. In this go[]d we trust.
Thanks for linking back to this article from last year. The current one will likely be similarly lost to memory soon enough. Such is the power [and curse] of motivated reasoning.
https://mobile.twitter.com/OpenToInfo/status/1026926017003315201
BTW, for now, the decision to install more PV seems well considered compared to the battery option.
sNAILmALEnotHAIL …but pace’n myself
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCeDkezgoyyZAlN7nW1tlfeA
life is for learning so all my failures must mean that I’m wicked smart
>
Thank you for your comment.
The public and the U.S. government has been repeatedly warned of the consequences of uncontrolled release of greenhouse gases into atmosphere since 1965, when President LBJ was the first President briefed. Whatever one might think of the present national mood on the matter, there was a time when that mood was largely absent. That the situation has gotten worse because of collective inaction is hardly a surprise: That’s how these things usually go.
The problem is basically that the U.S. public does not want to embrace its responsibility of educating itself to where it can understand the risks. And, no, this is not entirely the fault of fossil fuel companies, although they have been very opportunistic. The U.S. public does not want to contemplate, let alone implement the reduction in standard of living, however temporary, needed to make the transition from fossil fuels to zero Carbon. This includes building much smaller homes.
I have every confidence that, as Dr Tyson observes, when the wealthy begin to lose their wealth, there will be action. Alas, that’s likely to take a while and, by that time, as the science shows, a bunch of change will be committed and will last for a thousand years. That’s not forever, but it’s long. And we can still work together to keep things from getting worse.
But I see no will for it, and, with every year of delay, the amount of effort and the corresponding economic hurt casades:
But it can hardly be dropped at the feet of scientists.
Moreover, progressives, in my opinion, complicate matters when they try to marry things like climate justice, jobs, and immigration policy to energy and climate reform, mitigation, adaptation, and actions. They do not understand conditional probability. If
is the probability of action on climate change or adaptation or energy, and 
is the probability of action on something else, such as climate justice, jobs, and immigration policy, all which on their own are worthy causes, then it is mathematically true that 
and 
. In other words, lashing another issue onto climate reduces its likelihood. It by no means increases it.