“Fossil fuels’ future”


Science 15 August 2014:
Vol. 345 no. 6198 pp. 739-740
DOI: 10.1126/science.345.6198.739-d
LETTERS
Fossil fuels' future

The 27 June special section on The Great Gas Boom (“The gas surge,” D. Malakoff, p. 1464) about natural gas from hydraulic fracturing provided a useful update on a range of important environmental, social, and economic issues, with the exception of the elephant in the room: Natural gas is a fossil fuel. While a natural gas–fired power station has fewer CO2 emissions per unit energy produced compared with a coal-fired power station (up to 50% if fugitive emissions are captured or ignored) (“Hunting a climate fugitive,” News, E. Kintisch, p. 1472), this is largely irrelevant to solving the climate change problem. What matters is the long-term accumulated stock of carbon in the atmosphere, not the short-term rate of emissions (1).

The relationship between cumulative emissions and peak warming is insensitive to timing of emissions or peak emission rate (2). The lifetime of the airborne fraction of a pulse of fossil fuel–derived CO2 is much longer than the centuries some authors still believe (as stated in the News story by Kintisch). Modeling reveals that 20 to 35% of the CO2 emitted now will still be in the atmosphere after 2 to 20 millennia (3). To have a greater than 66% chance of limiting global warming to less than 2°C above the pre-industrial average surface temperature (4), humanity can emit only a further 275 Gt C, or about 34 years of “business-as-usual” emissions (5). The harsh reality is that CO2 emissions must decrease to zero before the end of this century or we will likely exceed the 2°C guard rail. In these circumstances, it is difficult to envisage a future where both the climate change problem is resolved and today's fossil fuel industry persists.

Brendan Mackey1, David Lindenmayer2
1 Griffith Climate Change Response Program, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia.
2 Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.

(1) B. Mackey, et al, Nature Climate Change 3, 552 (2013).
(2) M. R. Allen, et al, Nature 458, 1163 (2009).
(3) D. Archer, et al, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science 37, 117 (2009).
(4) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Copenhagen Accord (2009); http://unfccc.int/meetings/copenhagen_dec_2009/items/5262.php.
(5) T. F. Stocker, et al (eds.), IPCC, 2013: Summary for Policymakers in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2013).

About hypergeometric

See http://www.linkedin.com/in/deepdevelopment/ and http://667-per-cm.net
This entry was posted in carbon dioxide, Carbon Tax, citizenship, civilization, climate, climate education, conservation, consumption, demand-side solutions, ecology, economics, energy reduction, environment, geophysics, meteorology, methane, physics, politics, rationality, reasonableness, risk, science. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to “Fossil fuels’ future”

  1. Pingback: “Expectations for a new climate agreement” (Jacoby, Chen, MIT, 2014) | Hypergeometric

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s