This is a retake of a presentation at the invitation of the Walpole Greens and made at their meeting of 9th November 2020. It is longer and more leisurely. I interleave some of the answers to questions that followed the presentation in the presentation and the remainder, as best as I could remember, are answered at the end. Some of the answers given here are better than the answers I gave on Monday, the 9th, because I was able to look up more about the answers. For instance, there was a question about effects of climate change on PV array output. I answered it, but my answer at the presentation was not crisp.
This concerns a proposal by Norfolk County, Massachusetts to build a 6 MW solar array with two parts on Norfolk County land. There is a Commissioners’ meeting scheduled for the 19th of November to discuss the matter. There is opposition.
The slides are available below:
Choices–JGalkowski–FinalCutForMonday9Nov–20201108
The notes for the slides are available below:
Choices–ShortNotes–JanGalkowski20201108
There is a related report, produced by the Coalition for Community Solar Access, which is available below:
ShiningLightOnMassachusettsSolarLandUseTrends–Hering–Lord–2019
ecoquant
667 per centimeter : climate science, quantitative biology, statistics, and energy policy 
Pingback: Consumer, Employment, and Environmental Benefits of Electricity Transmission Expansion in the Eastern United States | 667 per cm
Pingback: Much ado about explosive methane | 667 per cm
Pingback: … [T]oo detached from my natural origins to see the problem … | 667 per cm
(This was posted by an individual identifying themselves as fp568468@outlook.com
https://falseprogress.home.blog/2016/08/29/windturbineslandscapes/.)
Segment from “Choices.” https://youtu.be/4ZM3EMRQnQI?t=1659 Sure, let’s axe more trees to sequester carbon, since crude old nature doesn’t do it fast enough to fix blunders by the same mindset that cleared so much land in the first place. This photo sums up that vision: https://imgur.com/a/IMNKFOs (cut, build, repeat…) Man must right old wrongs by committing more of them, eh? Part of your conscience must know that nature can’t be tricked indefinitely. It’s already being engineered to death to “create jobs” and such. I suggest taking a break from number-crunching and reading about environmental ethics and the problem with endless techno-fixes. This is no casual statement. You’re clearly no dummy, just too detached from your natural origins to see the real problem. https://newsociety.com/books/t/techno-fix
Pingback: Codium fragile for Saturday, 21st November 2020 | 667 per cm