Bob Inglis: “Energy optimists. Climate realists.”

Kudos.

I’m not, by their definition anyway, a conservative. In fact, I’m pretty apolitical these days although I will do things like demonstrate. But it’s completely clear to me this problem isn’t going to get solved without people of all political stripes chipping in and helping out, and to push them away by confounding solutions to climate disruption with, say, random progressive causes is not only just stupid, it’s evidence the actor does not take climate disruption seriously enough.

About ecoquant

See https://wordpress.com/view/667-per-cm.net/ Retired data scientist and statistician. Now working projects in quantitative ecology and, specifically, phenology of Bryophyta and technical methods for their study, notably Macrophotography. Some photos of mine: https://www.flickr.com/photos/198372469@N03/
This entry was posted in Anthropocene, atheism, bifurcations, Bill Nye, bridge to nowhere, capricious gods, carbon dioxide, Carbon Tax, citizenship, civilization, clean disruption, climate change, climate disruption, compassion, conservation, consumption, decentralized electric power generation, decentralized energy, demand-side solutions, destructive economic development, ecology, economics, education, energy reduction, energy utilities, environment, ethics, finance, fossil fuel divestment, global warming, humanism, Hyper Anthropocene, ignorance, investing, investment in wind and solar energy, meteorology, new forms of scientific peer review, NOAA, oceanography, physical materialism, physics, politics, rationality, reasonableness, risk, science, sociology, statistics, sustainability, Tea Party, UU Humanists. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Bob Inglis: “Energy optimists. Climate realists.”

  1. Pingback: University of Chicago economist Steve Cicala: Free dumping of carbon dioxide into atmosphere is nothing less than “theft” | Hypergeometric

Leave a Reply