This Earth Day: The Data

(Amendments on 25the April 2016.)

Sorry, folks, it’s It’s not just El Niño. El Niño’s have gotten bigger over the years.

Global-annual-average_750
(Click on image for a larger picture. Use your browser Back Button to return to blog.)

2016-04-22_180848
(Click on image for a larger picture. Use your browser Back Button to return to blog.)

2016-04-22_180249
(Click on image for a larger picture. Use your browser Back Button to return to blog.)

2016-04-22_180235
(Click on image for a larger picture. Use your browser Back Button to return to blog.)

2016-04-22_180217
(Click on image for a larger picture. Use your browser Back Button to return to blog.)

2016-04-22_180151
(Click on image for a larger picture. Use your browser Back Button to return to blog.)

2016-04-22_180102
(Click on image for a larger picture. Use your browser Back Button to return to blog.)

Hat tip to Dan Satterfield, and, of course, to the wonderful folks at NOAA who collect, analyze, and curate all this data. Keep tabs on things at their central site.

And don’t even get me started on the hooligans who publicly disclaim NOAA’s scientific veracity. The people in question are not simply ignorant, they are downright evil, and probably engaging in fraud, using the legal sense of the term, right along with organizations like Exxon-Mobil. BEST is independent of government. So why does BEST agree so well with NOAA?

And, there’s this, a plot I constructed in 2014 from the open data:

PredictabilityOfAtmosphericCO2FromFossilFuelEmissions
(Click on image for a larger picture. Use your browser Back Button to return to blog.)

The point is the nearly linear relationship between the two quantities, with time removed from the picture. Because time and dependent data sequences can be confusing to some, it’s often better to integrate it out, or collapse it.

About ecoquant

See https://wordpress.com/view/667-per-cm.net/ Retired data scientist and statistician. Now working projects in quantitative ecology and, specifically, phenology of Bryophyta and technical methods for their study.
This entry was posted in American Petroleum Institute, Antarctica, Anthropocene, Arctic, Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project, BEST, Bill Nye, carbon dioxide, Carbon Worshipers, Chevron, citizenship, civilization, climate, climate change, climate disruption, climate education, climate justice, corporate litigation on damage from fossil fuel emissions, corruption, Dan Satterfield, ecology, El Nina, El Nino, ENSO, environment, evidence, Exxon, false advertising, fear uncertainty and doubt, fossil fuels, fracking, geophysics, glaciers, glaciology, global warming, greenhouse gases, Gulf Oil, Hyper Anthropocene, ice sheet dynamics, icesheets, ignorance, James Hansen, John Cook, La Nina, meteorology, NASA, NCAR, NOAA, oceanography, open data, organizational failures, physics, rationality, reasonableness, regulatory capture, science, science education, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, sea level rise, selfishness, Spaceship Earth, statistics, sustainability, Texaco, the problem of evil, the right to know, the tragedy of our present civilization, UU Humanists, WAIS, WHOI, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, zero carbon. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply