Bayesian change-point analysis for global temperatures, 1850-2010

Professor Peter Congdon reports on two Bayesian models for global temperature shifts in his textbook, Applied Bayesian Modelling, as “Example 6.12: Global temperatures, 1850-2010”, on pages 252-253. A direct link is available online. The first is apparently original with Congdon, but the second is an adaptation of Thomson, Kimmerer, Brown, Newman, MacNally, Bennett, Feyrer, and Fleishman, “Bayesian change point analysis of abundance trends for pelagic fishes in the upper San Francisco Estuary”, Ecological Applications, 20(5), 2010, 1431-1448.

The first model supports changes in levels, and assumes change points are uniformly distributed across the entire history. It finds three change points during 1850-2010, approximately in the years 1929, 1978, and 1996, dividing the history into four regimes, the first two being relatively downlevel, and the last two uplevel, with 1996-2010 being especially pronounced. This offers an alternative and intriguing interpretation of the data discussed both at the Azimuth Project, and especially results of Fyfe, Gillett, and Zwiers reviewed therein, and by Tamino. The results are robust against alternative uniform priors, still yielding 1929, 1978, and 1996 as change points. The deviance information criterion (“DIC”; see also here, here, here, and here) value for the model is -552 and expected predictive deviance (“EPD”) is 0.319.

The second model allows for changes in levels and trends following the work quoted by Thomson, et al above. Because of the additional capability in this model, it discerns level shifts in 1964 (having a level shift probability of 0.96, by the way), with less probable shifts in 1946, 1896, and 1877. The highest probability for a trend shift occurs in 1945, but has a probability of only 0.30. The model fit of this second model is better by DIC, having a value of -558, and the EPD agrees, but slightly, having a value of 0.318.

A logical third model would be to only allow changes in trends rather than levels and trends. I’ll probably do that and write that up here some day, using the data Congdon provided.

By the way, the BUGS code is available for these examples in the package associated with Professor Congdon’s textbook.

About ecoquant

See Retired data scientist and statistician. Now working projects in quantitative ecology and, specifically, phenology of Bryophyta and technical methods for their study.
This entry was posted in Bayes, Bayesian, BUGS, climate, climate change, environment, forecasting, information theoretic statistics, mathematics, MCMC, meteorology, rationality, reasonableness, statistics, stochastic algorithms, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Bayesian change-point analysis for global temperatures, 1850-2010

  1. The global temperatures from the last century are important to understand where we are heading now. If we agree that the global temperature can be modified by our polluting activities due to the greenhouse effect produced in large quantities of CO2 accumulated in the upper atmosphere, we will understand that the environment will look different and the global temperature as well due to the modified energy sources used in the next twenty years.

    (This comment was not approved because it is not pertinent.)

Leave a reply. Commenting standards are described in the About section linked from banner.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.